<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description></description><title>mstudman.on {tumblelog}</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @antipodean)</generator><link>http://tumblelog.michaelstudman.com/</link><item><title>"I’ve lived long enough as a computer programmer to know it’ll never really be..."</title><description>“I’ve lived long enough as a computer programmer to know it’ll never really be “cool” to be one.”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; - &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bitwisemag.com/2/_Matthew-Huntbach_"&gt;Matthew Huntbach&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="http://www.bitwisemag.com/2/What-s-Wrong-With-Ruby"&gt;What’s Wrong With Ruby&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><link>http://tumblelog.michaelstudman.com/post/259299</link><guid>http://tumblelog.michaelstudman.com/post/259299</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Proof by Anagram</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Elvis =&gt; Lives&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Q.E.D.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://tumblelog.michaelstudman.com/post/234049</link><guid>http://tumblelog.michaelstudman.com/post/234049</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:57:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Recycling</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The fallacy of recycling according to popular thinking seems to be three-fold:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It assumes everything can be cleanly and efficiently recycled.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It assumes there’s an economic or societal need for the by-products of recycling.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It assumes that recycling somehow negates over-consumption.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We need to recycle, yes, but we also just need to consume less.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zefrank agrees: &lt;a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2007/03/031407.html"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2007/03/031407.html"&gt;http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2007/03/031407.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://tumblelog.michaelstudman.com/post/219448</link><guid>http://tumblelog.michaelstudman.com/post/219448</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:53:08 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
